Steven Montgomery invited you to Dropbox

	Steven Montgomery wants you to use Dropbox to sync and share files online and across computers. Get started here. - The Dropbox Team
	To stop receiving invites from Dropbox, click here © 2010 Dropbox

Communism vs. Christianity: Satan's Counterfeit

Steven Montgomery
Saturday, December 9, 2006

Freedom can sometimes be best understood by understanding its opposite. Well, you might ask, what is the opposite of freedom? A little over 25 years ago, former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson and Apostle of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, made a remarkable statement regarding freedoms opposite. Here are his remarks:

Whenever the God of Heaven reveals His gospel to mankind, Satan, the archenemy to Christ, introduces a counterfeit. . . Communism introduced into the world a substitute for true religion, It is a counterfeit of the gospel plan . . . Today, we are in the battle for the bodies and souls of man. It is a battle between two opposing systems: freedom and slavery, Christ and AntiChrist. . .

Then, Marion G. Romney, in the 1st Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in the September 1979 Church Magazine Ensign, wrote:

Communism is Satan's counterfeit for the gospel plan, and . . . it is an avowed enemy of the God of the land. (Marion G. Romney as quoted by Ezra Taft Benson, CR, Oct. 1979; Ensign, Nov 1979, pgs. 43-47)

Why did Ezra Taft Benson and Marion G. Romney consider Communism as a "substitute for true religion" and the "counterfeit of the gospel plan?" What prophetic insight did they have which would move them to make such striking statements?

Hints at Communism's true character, not as merely being atheistic but as an actual AntiChrist power can be glimpsed by looking into the writings of its founder--Karl Marx. In several poems he wrote about his allegiance to Satan. In a poem entitled, "The Pale Maiden," Marx wrote:

Thus heaven I've forfeited, I know it full well. My soul, once true to God, Is chosen for hell.

In a poem entitled, "The Player," Marx wrote:

The hellish vapors rise and fill the brain, Till I go mad and my heart is utterly changed. See this sword? The prince of darkness sold it to me. For me he beats the time and gives the signs. Ever more boldly I play the dance of death.

In another poem, he titled, "Invocation of One in Despair," Marx declares a war of personal revenge on God:

So a god has snatched from me my all In the curse and rack of destiny. All his worlds are gone beyond recall Nothing but

revenge is left for me. I shall build my throne high overhead, Cold, tremendous shall its summit be. For its bulwark, superstitious dreads. For its marshal, blackest agony....Then I will be able to walk triumphantly, like a god,through the ruins of their kingdom. Every word of mine is fire and action. My breast is equal to that of the creator.

Finally, in the same poem Marx wrote:

I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above.

What a hellish beginning to a philosophy, a false religion, a perfect counterfeit to the "gospel plan" which some estimates indicate have killed upwards of three hundred million people (See for instance, The Black Book Of Communism or Harvest of Sorrow by Robert Conquest).

But what, you may ask, give Communism its character as a counterfeit religion? A philosophy that would be appealing enough so as to replace God in the minds of its believers?

Apocalyptic vision

Communism's philosophy of dialectical and historical materialism gives its believers an apocalyptic vision and a sense of "spiritual" sacrifice and commitment. As a primer on Marxist philosophy explained it:

Historical materialism has a very important role. In the early years of Christianity, the Christians lived with the feeling that at any moment Christ might return and the world may end. This apocalyptic feeling gave fervor to early Christianity. Communism also shares that kind of apocalyptic vision. Historical materialism teaches people that we are now in the last days of history; we are the the great turning point. The entire history up to this point is just pre-history, and we are going to begin history when we begin communism. Furthermore it argues that communism is a historical inevitability. You can try to stop it, you can destroy yourself trying to stop it, but you cannot stop communism. (Causa Institute, Introduction to the CAUSA Worldview, pg. 71)

This primer then explained why communism gives its believers such a feeling of "religious" fervor and commitment:

Why was it that the war [Vietnam] was lost? Mao Tse Tung once said, 'Weapons are important, but they are not the decisive factor. Man is the decisive factor.' During the war in Vietnam, the men of our nation lacked a purpose to fight. The lyrics of a popular song went, 'And it's one, two, three. What are we fighting for? Don't ask me, I don't give a damn. Next stop is Vietnam.' This attitude stands in stark contrast to that of the communists. When the Chinese Communists occupied Peking after years of battling the forces of Chiang Kai Shek, stories began to appear about the attitude of Mao's soldiers. One story concerned participants on the "long march" who had nothing to eat. Supposedly those soldiers went to Mao Tse Tung explaining their situation. Mao replied, "Cook the leather of your shoes and eat it." This is what they allegedly did. When those troops finally marched victoriously into Peking, Mao gathered them and said, "Do not think that your lives will now be easier. They will not. But I promise you one thing. The lives of your children will be easier." What inspired people to live at such a level of sacrifice and commitment? What gave them that kind of determination? It was the Marxist ideology. Marxist ideology gives a dream and the steps to realize that dream. Many people attribute the deaths and sufferings of communism to Stalinism, but Lenin in _State and Revolution_ used Marx's writings to prove that brutal "means" were ideologically necessary in order to achieve the "end." the "end" was the Marxist dream. The Marxist dream has a mystical, almost religious quality. It has the ability to captivate people and to fill them with ideals and hopes of an almost religious character. In 1935, French writer Andre Gide, speaking of his experience with Marxism, said, "My conversion is like a faith. All my being is directed to a single goal. In the deplorable state of the modern world, the plan of the Soviet Union seems to constitute the salvation of humanity. (The God That Failed, Richard Crossman, ed., New York, Harper and Row, 1949, p. 173.)

In his final letter to his parents before his death, Che Guevarra communicated that same kind of ideal:

My Marxism has taken root within me and been purified. I believe in armed struggle as the only solution to those who wish to liberate themselves, and I am faithful to my beliefs. (Che Guevarra Speaks, p. 142.)

Marxism and its promises have been able to ignite people throughout the world with the conviction that ultimately a good and ethical world will emerge if they are willing to fight and sacrifice today. In a world which is devoid of God and His Gospel is it any wonder why Communism attracts and holds so many followers? Is it any wonder, then, that Ezra Taft Benson called Communism a "counterfeit of the gospel plan" and a "substitute for true religion?"

Alienation

But this is barely the beginning. There is a lot more to the story.

In the Gospel view, because of the fall of Adam, Man is cutoff and separated from God, has become spiritually "dead" and is thus alienated from God and spiritual things. To liberate man from the fall, an At-One-Ment is needed, to bring us into unity with God and the ability to achieve total freedom. This At-One-Ment is provided for us by a Savior, Jesus Christ.

Marx, on the other hand, has it inverted. He claims that man is cutoff not from God but "reality." Man, according to Marx, invents God and religion as a substitute for relations with the real world (Causa, p. 53.). To Marx, religion was "the fantastic realization of the human being inasmuch as the human being possesses no true reality" (Causa, p. 54.). Furthermore, Marx claims that man, in this condition, "has lost himself; been alienated. . . [and] is not a real species being" ( Marx, "On The Jewish Question", Marx Engels Collected Works, Vol 3, p. 159).

Furthermore, according to Marx, Labor takes the place of God. Frederich Engels, an associate of Marx, wrote that man is a highly developed animal which has evolved as a consequence of interaction with his material environment. This interaction has taken the form of labor. Through labor, man has developed the ability to communicate and the capacity to reason. The ape became man through labor, and it is labor which distinguishes man from ape. In Marxian theory then, labor replaces God as the creator of humankind, Engels writing that:

Labor . . . is the prime basic condition for all human existence, and this is to such an extent that, in a sense, we have to say that labor created man himself. (Marx and Engels, "The Holy Family", Marx Engels Collected Works, Vol 4, p. 36)

Getting back to the idea of alienation, Marx develops this theory even further. In his work, _Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844_, he described four types of alienation:

(I) Alienation of the laborer from the product of his labor. Whatever a man produces under the capitalist system is taken from him and becomes the property of the capitalist who hired him. The products of labor are taken then and become "an alien object from which the worker is estranged" (Causa p. 61).

(II) Alienation of the Laborer from his labor. When a worker works for someone else, "labor for the worker is not his own, but someone else's. (Marx, "Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844", Marx Engels Collected Works, Vol 3, p. 274.)

(III) Alienation of the human species. Under the capitalist system man is reduced to labor in order to merely survive and is thus cutoff from the basis of his humanity.

(IV) Alienation of man from man. According to Marx, Capitalism and the "division of labor" has denied man his humanity, he experiences no joy in a man to man relationship.

The solution to alienation, according to Marx, was to change the human condition by abolishing private property and establishing communal ownership--or communism. Only in this manner could man regain his dignity by overcoming this type of alienation and reestablishing his ties to the rest of humanity. Marx then, in an effort to overthrew God, made man the measure of all things.

Additionally, Marx held that is was economic alienation, in the form of private property, which gives rise to the notion of God and religious alienation. In order to truly "liberate" man, according to Marx, you must begin by cutting yourself off from your [to him] invented God which is preventing your from contact with reality and to accomplish this your must begin with the destruction of private property, since the ultimate basis of alienation was the underlying and unjust economic structure.

As a side note regarding the concept of "liberation" it is worthy of note to point out the many Marxist-Leninist "liberation" movements in the world. Such as the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and many others too numerous to mention.

By overthrowing God in this manner man is alienated not from God but from a vague "reality" that man has been harmed because the "products of labor" have been denied him. All of which harbors resentment and feelings of hatred.

Labor means everything to a communist. Labor replaces God in realizing the "ideal man" while it is the Gospel view that it is a belief in God and that man can progress towards becoming like God that matters.

Righteousness

The Communists believe in demanding and developing characters of "righteousness," that is, Marxist-Leninist righteousness. In the book, How To Be A Good Communist, Liu Shao-chi, past President of Communist China and brilliant Marxist theoretical writer says:

But if sacrifice has to made for the Party, for class and national liberation, that is, for the emancipation of mankind, for social evolution and for the interests of the greatest majority of mankind embracing countless millions of people, countless Communist Party members will face death with equanimity and make any sacrifice without the slightest hesitation. To the majority of Communist Party members, it will be accepted as a matter of course 'to lay down ones life for a noble cause' or 'to die for righteousness' if necessary. (Liu Shao-chi, How To Be A Good Communist, Peking: Foreign Language Press, pp. 55-56.)

But what is this righteousness for which they are ready to die? The type of conduct that will advance Communist world conquest.

It is interesting to compare and contrast other opposing concepts between the Christian Gospel and Communism as well. Such as the following.

Prometheus and the Humanist view

Marx view himself as the embodiment of Prometheus (in Greek mythology Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to man). Many early Communist posters characterized Marx chained to a rock, as was Prometheus. By deifying humanity man became the measure of all things rather than God.

Law

Karl Marx is credited with "discovering" the dialectical laws governing class struggle and the war with capitalism. On the other hand according to the Christian Gospel there are two forms of law: discovered law (the so-called laws of nature) and revealed law (the word of God as revealed to his Prophets).

Morality

Communists believe in dialectical materialism, which at its root simply means there is struggle, conflict, and destruction until the perfect Communist Society is established and any action which helps to propel society towards that eventuality is moral. As the Marxist Afanasayev noted:

From the point of view of Communist morality, that which promotes the movement of society towards communism is moral (V. G. Afanasayev, Marxist Philosophy, USSR, Progress Publishers).

This Marxist idea of morality is certainly not the Christian morality--that of obedience to God and his laws.

Additionally, the Marxist founder of Planned Parenthood wrote in her book, The Pivot of Civilization, that the drama of history was played out as a struggle to free bodies and minds from self-imposed constraints of morality, the "cruel morality of self-denial and sin." Sexual liberation was touted by her as the way to find "inner peace and security and beauty" and the way to conquer societies faults was to "remove the constraints and prohibitions which no hinder the release of inner energies [sexual energy, according to Sanger]," for then "most of the larger evils of society will perish." Marxism's vendetta then, is to portray sexual liberation, in the words of Nancy Pearcy, a Christian and Marxist critic, as a "moral crusade, in which Christian morality is the enemy, and opposition to it is a heroic moral stance."

Struggle

As previously stated, to a Marxist there is a war going on. A struggle and conflict, and if necessary wars of liberation. In the Christian concept the struggle is between good and evil, against Satan and the flesh.

Creator

Physical matter, according to Marx is the great creator. Or, as Lenin put it:

We maybe regard the material and cosmic world as the supreme being, the cause of all causes, the creator of heaven and earth

Quite a contrast to the Christian view of creation.

Savior or Messiah

Under Marx's view of the world the Savior is the proletariat. Lenin modified this by making the dictatorship of the proletariat the savior of mankind. Of course, the gospel view is that Jesus Christ and him alone is the Savior of the world.

Peace

Peace will only be established, according to the Marxist worldview, when capitalism is overthrown and abolished, and the "paradisaical state," envisioned by Marx--the primitive communal society--is finally established and the world enjoys a classless society.

---

Other Comparisons:

Both Communism and the Gospel of Jesus Christ share a view of a Paradisical state:

1. Marx's primitive communal society, or when communism if finally established and the world enjoys a classless society.
2. The garden of Eden and the world in general enjoyed a paradisaical glory before the fall.

Both share a view of "reality":

1. Marx: Matter is real
2. Gospel: Reality is of a dual nature, both matter and spirit.

Both share a view of "evil":

1. Marx: Evil consists of the bourgeoisie and capitalist system.
2. Gospel: Evil is disobedience to God. Evil is the word "live" turned around, and those who commit evil kill themselves spiritually.

Both share a view of missionary work:

1. Marx: The Communist Party is the vanguard of salvation, and has a worldwide mission and vision.
2. Gospel: Missionary work is done by the Spirit through members of the Church and scriptures (the Book of Mormon) expressly designed for this purpose. Missionary work also has a worldwide mission and vision. The earth is to be flooded with the Book of Mormon.

Both use "sacred" writings:

1. Marx: The works of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc., is where the true doctrine of Marxism is contained.
2. Gospel: The Bible, the Book of Mormon, and other ancient and modern works written under the influence of the Holy Ghost.

Both share "Prophetic" heros or types:

1. Marx: Marx is equal to Moses, Lenin to Christ. Lenin's corpse is equivalent to Catholic saint worship.
2. Gospel: All of the Prophets of the Bible and Book of Mormon are types of Christ. Every sanctified man will reflect Christ in his character.

Both share a view of "Class":

1. Marx: With the division of mankind into classes ensures that there will be a class struggle. The class struggle will eventually lead to everyone becoming equal.
2. Gospel: Salvation is offered freely to all. However, in the Father's House are many mansions.

Both share a view of Historical Inevitability:

1. Marx: Historical Materialism. History is inexorably working its way towards communism and nothing will stand in its way.
2. Gospel: God's plan of history is the working out of a divine chiastic structure, where the end is comparable to the beginning and the beginning to the end. Nothing will hinder the work in its progress.

Both share a view of Paradise on Earth:

1. Marx: Worker's paradise.
2. Gospel: Millenial peace and prosperity

Both share a view of the "perfected" man:

1. Marx: The Marxist ideal or perfect man.
2. Gospel: "Be ye therefore perfect. . ."

Why was George Bush, Sr., weeping?

Frankly, I have no way to verify the truth of this story, but if true, this is the most important story in several decades!

Sr. loses trillions in naked short meltdown

Christopher Story, author of the article, is located in the UK and has for years been a highly accurate intelligence and economic analyst of world affairs. I have no reason to suspect that his analysis is anything other than the truth.

Putin's Ph'd Dissertation: Plagiarism of the first degree

It seems that Martin Luther King is not the only one to have faked his Ph'd Dissertation:

Putin's Ph'd Dissertation

Litvenenko, Putin, and Russia

While researching the Alexander Litvenenko murder I came across a great blog on Russia. Here it is:

Russophobe

Here's the introductory statement:

A Not-for-Profit Russia blog recording the rise (and hopefully fall) of the Neo-Soviet Union.

The Iraqi Constitution by Steven Montgomery

I thought you might be interested in the following regarding the Iraqi
Constitution:

Iraqi Blueprint for Tyranny

US Blood is not buying a Free Iraq

Text of the Draft Iraqi Constitution

The last URL is the complete text of the proposed Iraqi Constitution
(as of Aug 28th 2005 at least). The first URL is a criticism of the
constitution, showing what the Bush administration's real intent is,
according to the New American magazine. The second compares the rights
contained in the Iraqi Constitution
with both the Bill of Rights and the 1977 Soviet Constitution.
--

Steven Montgomery
graymada@gmail.com

Explore Freedom: http://www.geocities.com/graymada

Moral Anarchy: Seedbed of Tyranny

Sometimes even poor movies offer great lessons. In the theatrical flop, "Wild Wild West," President Grant, played by Robert Conrad, humorously unloads a lesson germane to modern American culture. Upon being surprised that the arch-villain, Arliss Loveless, had been planning for and waging war against the United States he exclaimed, "I didn't know that we were at war. You have me at a great disadvantage."

At this moment a similar war is being waged against the United States of America. A war in which prevailing ignorance of its existence has put our country at a similar disadvantage. A war which has put the continued existence of our American way of life at great peril.

This is a war being waged against us by "religious" fanatics. A war being waged by believers in an ideology which because of its destruction could be termed the greatest anti-Christ or anti-God power in the world today. A war being waged by fanatic believers in the ideology of Marx and Lenin.

As Doctor Fred Schwarz wrote in his book, You Can Trust The Communists: To Be Communists:

The fundamental doctrine of Marxism, therefore, is that Russia and America are at war; that China and America are at war-- not that they could be at war; not that they might be at war; not that they will be at war; but that they are at war. This war is historically declared; it is universal; it encompasses every aspect of society; in it there can be no vestige of truce. The Communists did not choose it; they simply recognized it. Their duty is to prosecute the war to total and complete victory. (Chapter One, Trust The Communists?)

But, just as Voltaire and Weishaupt, two of the conspiratorial and ideological forerunners of Marxism noted, direct confrontation would be foolish. It would expose the world to their real designs and aims--which was to "crush the wretch,' or Christianity, and to overthrow civil and social institutions--but I'm getting ahead of myself and will leave this subject for a future article..

So, Schwarz continues, "The weapons of this warfare" were to be "not merely the classical weapons of guns, tanks, bombs, and aircraft." The weapons were to be universal. "Education is a weapon; language is a weapon; trade is a weapon; diplomacy is a weapon; religion is a weapon; cultural interchange is a weapon. The Communists view every act and judge every situation as part of the class war."

Today, knowing that a direct confrontation with the United States or the rest of the West would be foolish, and that the United States is still too strong at present, they must weaken it. As Marxist-Leninist ideologue Possony wrote, the "use of violence must be preceded, accompanied, and followed by techniques aiming at demoralization and at preventing the enemy from using violence."1

To "prevent" us from "using violence" Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and now Putin, have entered into arms reduction agreements (with no intention of keeping) with the U.S. while at the same time modernizing their weaponry. Aside from these agreements, a new dimension to weaken the West was to be added, "the new social movements"2 , or that of the ecology, peace, women's and gay liberation movements.

American society must not only be demoralized but turned into a moral wasteland. The enemy knows that their "perfect system of communism" can only be built upon the ashes of anarchy and chaos. They therefore make war against all the wisdom that has come to men through the ages of experience. They seek to overturn and destroy the very foundations upon which society, government and religion rest.

Anarchy has always been the seedbed of tyranny, so moral anarchy is the goal. A "psy-ops war" war then is being conducted against us where Infidelity, atheism, unchastity,intemperance, civil corruption, greed, avarice, ambition--personal, political, national--are glorified and promoted--all in an effort to weaken us and our will to resist. The casualties in this war include those who have been pulled and thrust into new fields of action--hence the "peaceniks" who have mutated into environmental and NAMBLA activists and new lines of thought--the moral relativists mutating into the worship of "self esteem", a belief in aliens, magic and "new age" psychology. Activists which then shake the faith, undermine the morals, pollute the lives of people who are then thrown so far off balance in their activities, economic, social, political and religious that liberty and freedom stand in danger of being replaced by the greatest, most widespread, and most complete tyranny that has ever oppressed man.3

Yet, this is a war in which the belligerents work under such perfect disguise that many do not recognize them or their methods. Subtlety is often used. Such as putting a picture of Mao, Lenin, Che Guevara, or a clenched fist salute in the background of a movie. Or portraying businessmen as greedy capitalist pigs or the apocalyptic scenarios where the decadent capitalist society has been laid waste so that a "new society" can be built upon its ashes.

Yuri Besimov described some other methods. A former KGB operative, he was trained as an "Active Measures" operative to demoralize and destabilize "target countries". In 1984 he listed ways the KGB would soften a society by:

    The Production, promotion and distribution of drugs.
    The production, promotion and distribution of pornography.
    Efforts to get a society interested in sex and then more sex.
    The promotion of various types of culturally destroying music and art.
    Infiltrate the media: Movies, T.V., Magazines, etc., in order to steer efforts to further weaken society morally4


Who among us can say we have been untouched by this Marxist inspired moral decay? Today--if we wish to avoid the consequences of this ongoing Cultural Revolution--we must awake and arouse ourselves to a sense of our awful situation. We must realize that we are at war and return the fire. But this war will not be won by tanks, planes, bombs or paratroopers, this is an ideological war and ideological bullets must be fired.

America's real arsenal of freedom was found in her liberty loving faith and beliefs. John Adams understood what protected, prospered and made America great. In a letter to a friend many years after the war,he explained what it was that really won the war of revolution:

"The Revolution was affected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people.... This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution.5"

Will America collectively remember what made her great? Perhaps it's still not too late?

End Notes

1. Possony, Stefan T. "A Century of Conflict: Communist Techniques of World Revolution". Chicago: Regnery. 1953. p. 87. See Also, Montgomery, Steven. "Glasnost-Perestroika: A Model Potemkin Village."

2. Timmerman, Heinz. "The Decline of the World Communist Movement". Boulder: Westview Press, 1987. pg. xvii.

3. Here I have paraphrased parts of a speech given by President David O. Mckay of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on October 3, 1942. Here is the original paragraph:

    These days through which we are now passing present many problems which are new to all of us but are particularly strange to the younger generation-those who have little background of experience and whose knowledge is limited and immature. Infidelity, atheism, unchastity, intemperance, civil corruption, greed, avarice, ambition-personal, political, national-are more powerful today than at any other time in the lives of us now living. They are pulling and thrusting us almost at will into new fields of action, new lines of thought. They are shaking the faith, undermining the morals, polluting the lives of the people. They have thrown many so far off balance in all of their activities, economic, social, political, and religious, that they stand in real danger of falling. Satan is making war against all the wisdom that has come to men through their ages of experience. He is seeking to overturn and destroy the very foundations upon which society, government, and religion rest. He aims to have men adopt theories and practices which he induced their forefathers, over the ages, to adopt and try, only to be discarded by them when found unsound, impractical, and ruinous. He plans to destroy liberty and freedom-economic, political, and religious, and to set up in place thereof the greatest, most widespread, and most complete tyranny that has ever oppressed men. He is working under such perfect disguise that many do not recognize either him or his methods. There is no crime he would not commit, no debauchery he would not set up, no plague he would not send, no heart he would not break, no life he would not take, no soul he would not destroy. He comes as a thief in the night; he is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Without their knowing it, the people are being urged down paths that lead only to destruction. Satan never before had so firm a grip on this generation as he has now.


4. Besimov, Yuri, Remarks of a talk given in Salt Lake City Utah, December 1984.

5. Adams, John (American president, 1735-1826).
Letter to Hezekiah Niles, 13. February 1818

As the Roman Republic was dying, as is the The Republic of the United
States, the great Roman Senator, Marcus Tullius Cicero, in the year 42 B.C.
discussed what is going on in the Halls of Congress, the White House and
the Supreme Court when he said:

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot
survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for
he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among
those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the
galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor
appears not a traitor—he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and
wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that
lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation—he works
secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city—he
infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is
less to be feared. The traitor is the carrier of the plague......." Cicero,
42 B.C.

Think about it!!!!

--
Steven Montgomery
graymada@accesswest.com